Contents
Which event have you gone back to, year after year, without anyone having to persuade you? For most people, in most countries, the answer is not a concert or a ticketed festival. It is the street fair their grandparents also went to, the school fair where they meet the same parents every spring, the neighbourhood evening during Ramadan or the Christmas market on the same square, the night their home-region association fills a hall in the big city. Community events are the gatherings a place makes for its own people, and largely with them, and people keep coming back when the date stays put, when they had a hand in making the event and when it feels like it belongs to their street.
That audience is the most loyal one we have, and our industry knows remarkably little about it, because it does not show up in ticket sales and it rarely fills out a survey. Yet it decides whether a community event survives. A concert can be a one-night success with a crowd that never returns. A community event that people don’t come back to has failed, however full its first evening looked, which is why the question I find most useful is not how to fill the square once but why people return.
Street fairs, school fairs and home-region nights
The range of community events is wide: neighbourhood festivals, the seasonal fair that some places have held for generations, school fairs and charity bazaars, a city’s own anniversary, religious holiday evenings in the square, association nights where people who share a home region or a country of origin gather far from it, a children’s day in the park, a harvest celebration in a village.
What ties these together is how close the audience and the hosts are. The people who come are neighbours, parents, shopkeepers and members of the same association, and many of them are part of what makes the event happen as well as its guests. That closeness is where their strength comes from. It is also what the standard event formula tends to overlook.
Why does the date matter more than the line-up?
Because people can only come back to something they can find again. An event that keeps to one weekend, year in and year out, slowly enters the life of a place: in the first year few people know about it, in the second those who came remember, and by the third or fourth, families plan around it, relatives who live elsewhere ask whether it is that weekend again and shopkeepers stock up in advance. The old seasonal fairs prove the point. Some have kept their time of year for so long that nobody needs to announce them.
The chain is fragile, though. An event that changes its month, misses a year or is renamed when its file changes hands has to rebuild its place in the calendar from the beginning, and I think organizers and agencies underestimate how much is lost each time. When an event passes from one team to another, the most valuable lines in the handover file are not the stage plan or the supplier list. They are the date and the name, which together make up most of a small event’s legacy.
Repetition only works, of course, if the first visit was good enough to repeat. Regulars forget how much they know: which gate is open, whether the workshop needs booking, whether you are supposed to bring your own chair. A newcomer knows none of it, and an event that relies on word of mouth rarely tells them. A visible welcome point with a person at it, a timetable people can actually read and a few seats at the edge for those who like to watch before they join make more difference than they seem to. So does being honest about money. “Free entry” tells a family nothing about whether the workshop, the children’s rides and the food will cost them something, and a parent who is surprised at the third stand tends not to bring the children back.
People return to what they helped build
Frankly, the most reliable way to bring people back is to give them a part.
In many places, and certainly in Türkiye where I work, that rarely happens through formal volunteer programs. Apart from a few large organisations, community events do not run on volunteer teams. They run on ties that already exist. The shopkeepers’ association runs a stand, the home-region association brings its folk dance group, the local school prepares a performance and every parent in the class comes to watch, the residents’ association spreads the word through the neighbourhood. In smaller districts the local trade often is the event: they put up the tents, find the sponsors and lend a hand when it starts to rain.
People return to a community event when they recognise themselves in it, and that recognition is built by repetition and by giving them a part, not by a bigger stage.
That has a practical consequence for organization companies like ours. When we are brought in to professionalise a community event, the temptation is to take over everything and deliver a clean, efficient package, and done carelessly that turns the people who used to build the event into people who rent a stand at it. My own conviction is that a professional organizer’s job here is to make local participation easier, safer and better coordinated, not to replace it. In that sense the work is closer to recreation management than to show production, because the aim is to keep people taking part rather than only watching.
Giving people a part also means being clear about which part. Coming to watch, running a stand, being asked for an opinion and actually choosing a slice of the program are very different invitations, and the International Association for Public Participation’s spectrum of public participation is a useful reminder that each one promises a different amount of influence. If the local associations are asked to choose the second evening, they should know the budget, the finishing time and who signs it off. If they are only being consulted, say so, and tell them afterwards what came of their ideas. What drives people away is being asked for ideas that were never going to change anything. Nor should “it is a local event” become a reason to expect free work from the local caterer, sound engineer or dance teacher who would be paid at any other event.
A truck-mounted stage looks the same in every district
Many community events, in many cities, share a familiar shape: a truck-mounted stage, a well-known singer for the final night, the usual circuit of food vendors, a row of sponsor logos and a generator humming behind it all. In a holiday season, a very similar program of tents, puppet shows and evening concerts turns up in the public spaces of district after district of the same city.
Nobody means any harm by it. Organization companies have a package that works, it is easy to quote and easy to deliver, and the client gets a predictable evening. The cost is that a neighbourhood festival on one side of the city and another on the far side become nearly interchangeable, and people have little reason to be loyal to either.
The obvious reply from the client’s side is that the famous name is what brings people out, and on the final night that is often true. I would not drop the concert. But a crowd that comes for a singer comes from all over the city, stays for an hour and leaves after the encore, and very little of it connects with the neighbourhood that hosted the evening. The earlier days, when the school performs and the local stands are open, draw a smaller audience that lingers, talks and returns, and if the budget has to choose, I would rather protect those days than spend another slice on the headline fee.
Fixing that rarely needs more money. It needs one or two things that belong only to that place: the dish a particular neighbourhood is known for, the craft of a local workshop, a performance by the school everyone’s children attend, a corner for whichever home-region association is strongest there. These are the details people talk about afterwards, and precisely what a standard package leaves out. They are also what a sponsor remembers, because a brand standing next to the school choir belongs to the night instead of being another logo on the fence.
What do the neighbours who never attend get out of it?
Too often, nothing but the noise. Every community event has two sets of neighbours: those who come, and those who live right beside it and stay home. The second group hears the sound check in the afternoon, cannot park in their own street for three days and finds rubbish outside the door the next morning. Ignore them and the event slowly loses the goodwill it depends on. It is a pattern I know well from the field: a quiet first year, complaints in the second, and before long the event has to move and start over somewhere else.
Talking to them beforehand changes a great deal. A short meeting with residents’ representatives, building managers and shopkeepers, a clear finishing time, a phone number for problems that somebody actually answers, someone to sweep the side streets once it is over and, where possible, something in the program for them: a children’s morning in the nearest urban park, a quieter afternoon for older people, free entry for residents of the street. Once neighbours feel the event is partly theirs, they put up with its noise far more willingly, and some of them turn up the following year as guests. UN-Habitat’s guidelines for assessing public space at neighbourhood level look at a square or park through how it is used day to day and what the people around it say, and a recurring event is better judged the same way: by how it fits the ordinary life of the place for the rest of the year.
Counting the faces that come back
Community events tend to be judged with the yardsticks of big concerts and even mega events: total attendance, the size of the headline name, the number of photos shared. By those measures a school fair looks like a lesser version of the real thing, which I think gets it the wrong way round. A community event is succeeding when the same families return, when different ages find something at different hours and when people living nearby feel it belongs to them, and a packed final concert with a crowd from across the city can sit alongside a neighbourhood that feels left out of its own festival.
Measuring return does not need complicated systems. Asking a sample of visitors whether they came last year, counting how many stands are run by local businesses, noting how many associations and schools took part and whether they want to be involved again: these figures say more about a community event than its headcount.
The faces at the gate belong in the same count. At most community events, the people at the entrance and the information desk are temporary staff: daily workers supplied by a hostess agency, university students called in for part of the work, set-up crews hired by the day. They often arrive without a briefing, sometimes wait weeks for their pay and are rarely properly insured. For visitors they are the event, since most of the visitor experience passes through their hands, and when the same well-prepared people come back each year they know the site, the neighbours and the regulars in a way no stage can replace. Getting there starts small, with half an hour of briefing before the gates open, a meal and a break during the day, payment on time and a call to the same people the following year.
How many of this year’s guests were also here last year, and how many of them had a hand in making it happen?
It is the figure I most want to see in a community event report.